Field access as insight
Ethnographic perspectives on gender equality work in appointment procedures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60789/921229Keywords:
third party funding, field access, gender equality, research ethic, appointment proceduresAbstract
The commentary concurs with Victoria Hegner’s argument about the analytical potential of field access in ethnographic studies. Building on Victoria Hegner’s reflections, it proposes a typology by which strategies of resistance to ethnographic access could be systematized and used as analytical leverage. The ethnographer’s multiple positionalities within her field are taken as an occasion to reflect on the epistemic and ethical consequences of such entanglements. Finally, the commentary endorses Hegner’s claim that loose, relatively weak ties can be crucial for securing access to the field. The resulting experimental openness and uncertainty of ethnographic inquiry may have implications for its status within an institutional research landscape that is heavily dependent on external third-party funding.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Julian Hamann

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
